Quote of the Day
From an email exchange following the Nobel prize-winning physicist’s resignation from the American Physical Society because of its blind embracing of the global warming faith:
“In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?”
Read it here.
Australian Climate Madness 
How can anyone seriously use the word ‘incontrovertible’ as a scientific term, as in, “the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible”, by the American Physical Society.
Incontrovertible is a non-scientific term. The very nature of science means that nothing is incontrovertible. Everything should be challenged. To say otherwise is blind acceptance that everything we know is a fact and we would never sail to the end of the Earth for fear of falling off the edge!
carefull there baldrick ,with falling of the edge of the earth don`t you know it was once concensus that the world was flat?
So true Bevan and luckily today we still have some scientists, like Ivar Giaever who say no to the incontrovertible.
Just like a fellow scientist said many years ago against the consensus, ‘Hang on a minute, this theory of Phlogiston is bollocks’ and proved it so. Unless of course they worked for the American Physical Society where everything relating to global warming is settled.
Bollocks!