Stephan Lewandowsky knows nothing about climatology, meteorology, geology, atmospheric physics or thermodynamics, but that trivial obstacle does not prevent him believing the alarmist consensus with such fervour that he uses his own “discipline” (if you can call it that) of… Read More ›
A retarded amoeba with a half-a-dozen neurons for a brain could see that the Lew & Cook conspiracy papers are a transparent attack on heretics of their AGW religion, and that they give junk science a bad name. As a… Read More ›
UPDATE: Cook and Lew tie themselves in syntactical and grammatical knots over at Un-Sk Ps-S trying to explain that they weren’t really calling Betts a conspiracy theorist… In John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky’s twisted version of reality, anyone who disagrees with them… Read More ›
[UPDATE 3 [8 Feb, 07.30 AEST]: Jo Nova has more on Mr Hubble Marriott here. [UPDATE 2 [7 Feb, 18.40 AEST]: This is all in the public domain now, so I am sharing it here. The fourth author on this… Read More ›
You will recall the story recently where ABC “science” presenter Robyn Williams opened a programme on climate “denial” with the following: “What if I told you that paedophilia is good for children, or that asbestos is an excellent inhalant for… Read More ›
UPDATE: A commenter jokingly suggests below that Lew should “see a shrink”, but the strange thing is that he ticks several of the boxes for the psychological characteristic of narcissism, including: Magical thinking: Narcissists see themselves as perfect, using distortion and illusion known as magical… Read More ›
Lewandowsky – Universtiy of Western Australia Graham Readfearn complains at DeSmogBlog that climate bloggers including myself are: “using FOI to rifle through scientists’ daily emails. … [FOI] is a law which appears to have been hijacked by climate science sceptics… Read More ›
Two stories, taken together, demonstrate beyond any shadow of doubt, that the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) is a mouthpiece for Labor, the Left in general and the Green agenda. OK, you’re saying, tell me something I didn’t know. Yes, yes,… Read More ›
UPDATE 2 [Tuesday 16 October]: Further research has unearthed the specific procedure for amending an ethics approval at UWA. It can be found here. It states, inter alia: When would a new ethics application be required? Should a request for an… Read More ›
UPDATE: Bizarrely, a paper exists which is roughly in accordance with the original ethics application: “In a large experiment, participants extrapolated global climate data, presented graphically either as share prices or temperatures.” (Link) So it looks (allegedly) as if Lewandowsky,… Read More ›
