"It's wool's time to help the planet"


Yes, you read that right. The latest crazy scheme to “save the planet” requires us all to wear more clothes, in particular of the woollen variety, so that we can turn our heating down and reduce our emissions. Not very helpful in Australia, however, which is, like, a hot country? And especially on days like today in Sydney, when the temperature is 38°C and we’re all wearing shorts, the aircon is on full blast, the little disk in the electricity meter is whizzing round at a hundred miles an hour about to fly off its bearings, and all the Hunter Valley power stations are chewing through coal like it’s going out of fashion and spewing out hundreds of tonnes of CO2 every second, but still, let’s stick with it.

AUSTRALIAN Wool Innovation (AWI) today launched the Wool Carbon Alliance to market the natural benefits of wool as the ideal fibre to help reduce global warming.

The alliance, a group of Australian and international wool industry representatives, says that international research shows a household can significantly reduce its carbon emissions by living with wool: insulating with wool, wearing wool, walking, sleeping and sitting on wool.

The European Commission reports that a household can cut its CO2 emissions by up to 300kg a year and energy bill by 5-10 per cent simply by reducing its heating by a mere 1°C, it says.

Wool has an important role to play as part of the everyday carbon solution,” alliance chair and AWI board member Chick Olsson said.

“Ours is an ambitious plan to let the world know just how versatile our great natural fibre is. It’s wool’s time to help the planet and for us to sell more wool in the process.”

If I were cynical, I would say this is nothing but a shameless marketing ploy to benefit from a free ride on the climate change and global warming bandwagon. But I’m not, so I won’t.

Read it here.

Slaughter buffalo, eat your dog… all to save the planet


45 minutes at gas mark 7.

45 minutes at gas mark 7.

The lunatic fringe is in full voice at the moment, advocating all kinds of idiotic schemes to “save the planet from climate change”. Last week it was a pair of New Zealand “scientists” who had calculated that your pet dog has a larger carbon footprint than a Toyota Landcruiser. Their book is charmingly entitled “Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living“, and was all unquestioningly reported by the global media, including our own Fairfax:

The couple from Wellington’s Victoria University measured the carbon emissions of popular pets, taking into consideration what and how much the animal eats and the land needed to create that food.

The shock verdict was that owners of large dogs are as much in the dog box on environmental sustainability as owners of the oft-criticised four-wheel drive.

“A lot of people worry about having SUVs but they don’t worry about having Alsatians and what we are saying is, well, maybe you should be because the environmental impact … is comparable,” Brenda Vale said. (source)

Then today we read of another wackademic proposing that 150,000 feral buffalo be culled in order to reduce emissions:

Charles Darwin University’s Professor Stephen Garnett says an individual buffalo emits the equivalent of about a tonne of carbon dioxide each year.

He says feral animals release around 4 per cent of the Northern Territory’s annual greenhouse gas emissions.

Professor Garnett says outstation communities should be paid to cull feral buffaloes to fight climate change.

“There’s many places where you can’t run a buffalo ranching operation,” he said.

“There’s potential for reducing those numbers as a greenhouse gas mitigation measure.

Each adult buffalo produces the equivalent of about a tonne of carbon dioxide each year and they live quite a long time. So that is a reasonable amount of carbon dioxide they are producing.” (source)

Where will this all end? Clearly the 6 billion humans belching and farting 24/7 must have a pretty big carbon footprint as well. When are we going to start culling them? We’ll leave the last word to Robert Vale:

Robert Vale told New Scientist magazine that we need to consider pet sharing: think the theatre cat or the temple dog.

And if you must have your own you should enjoy it for both its companionship and its flesh.

He recommends hens, which partly compensate for their eco-footprint by providing eggs, as well as pigs, or even rabbits, “provided you eat them”.

Fido and chips all round, then…