I woke up this morning to hear Stephen Conroy’s lamentable, blustering performance on Lateline last night, repeated on News Radio. Now there’s a fine way to start the day … There was all the usual spin and hot air, but the funniest bit came when Tony Jones (who is one of the ABC’s most vocal climate change alarmists) held up his hands in horror at Maurice Newman’s accusation that the ABC was less than balanced on the issue of climate change. It was a classic “What, me?” moment. And then he successfully bullied Conroy into saying “No, no, it’s all fine you’re doing a great job”, and Conroy didn’t have the balls to resist:
TONY JONES: Alright, a final question. You’ve refused to comment in any detail on the claims by the ABC’s chairman Morris Newman that coverage of the global warming climate change issue is an example of “group think” where contrary views have not been tolerated.
Do you see any evidence of that?
STEPHEN CONROY: Well, look, the chairman… The ABC is an independent statutory authority. The chairman is entitled to his views and I understand from discussions that I’ve had over the last 24 hours it was a very robust discussion that followed that, uh, that speech and I think that is a healthy thing for all involved.
TONY JONES: Do you see any evidence? I am asking for your opinion. Whether you see- because it is a serious accusation he’s making: “Should there be a view that the ABC was sheltering particular beliefs from scrutiny or failing to question the consensus, I would consider it to be a dangerous perception that could lead to the public’s trust in us being undermined”.
That is the suggestion. Do you see any evidence that that has been happening?
STEPHEN CONROY: Well, I do remember that the ABC screened the documentary the Global Warming Scandal, I think last year.
TONY JONES: Swindle.
STEPHEN CONROY: Swindle, sorry, yes. So I think the ABC can point to a whole range of areas where it has given all sides of the debate a fair run.
TONY JONES: So you don’t see any examples or signs of “group think” in the ABC?
STEPHEN CONROY: Well, I am not sure that Mr Newman pointed his finger at any particular area. I don’t think he was speaking in a general sense but on an issue that you’ve mentioned like climate change, I think you’ve got a proud record where you can point to the screening of that documentary and there’s been plenty of debate over the last 12 months on this topic on the ABC. (source)
Ah, so showing the Great Global Warming Swindle is balance is it? Let’s remember what happened there, shall we? Firstly, Tony Jones himself, who was presenting the film, proclaimed before it was shown:
I am bound to say The Great Global Warming Swindle does not represent the views of the ABC.
Which means that the public service broadcaster has “views” on climate change – and I don’t need to tell you what they are. Hardly balance there. And following the screening, there was a round table debate in which TGGWS was thoroughly ripped to shreds by a typical ABC left-leaning audience. The hypocrisy is breathtaking. Why did the ABC take TGGWS apart, and yet never raise a finger to the partisan, innaccurate propaganda film An Inconvenient Truth? Where were the round table discussions picking that apart, Tony? No, wait. You’ve already explained. TGGWS doesn’t represent the views of the ABC, because AIT does, right?
If you want to see ABC bias at work for yourself, just go to the ABC’s Great Global Warming Swindle pages here and especially the nauseating article by Bernie Hobbs (ABC science broadcaster) here – it’s all there in black and white.
ABC balance on climate change? Don’t make me laugh.
ABC has already given itself the “all clear” on bias running this article:-
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/17/2848995.htm
The frightening part is they want to expand their operations. What can we expect from a bigger ABC? Oh dear….
Didn’t see Lateline last night but from past experience I could imagine the performance. What amused me in the above article was the reference to the airing of the Great Global Warming Swindle. Presumably as a great example of the ABC’s “balance.” Yes, it was aired but was followed up with an intense, forensic grilling by Jones. This was picked up by one of the debate panel members who congratulated Jones on his intense scrutiny of the film. He then challenged Jones to do the same with Gores B grade Horror flick. The challenge was brushed aside. Balance? Yeah right. The funniest part is that the ABC truly believe they ARE balanced and are incensed that people are not impressed by their collective back slapping.
Let’s not forget the ABC’s 2-day news blackout of ClimateGate. It first broke on Air Vent 9pm Thursday of Air Vent’s server local time (UTC-05), which was about midday Friday of our time. By 11pm Friday night our time I had found a copy of the leaked zip file. On Friday night, no ABC news about it.
By Saturday morning the news had appeared on the Wall Street Journal, no less. By Saturday night, still no ClimateGate on ABC.
Sunday morning I got cranky and sent them a nastygram about the lack of reporting, making my opinion clear that they had a bias. They replied on Monday linking to articles on their web site that had been published on Sunday about the “hacking” of CRU.
A few days late and a taxpayer dollar short.