Gavinology

Cartoons by Josh

Josh has done a brilliant job of skewering Gavin Schmidt’s discomfort over his recent comments about a debate with sceptics. As Bishop Hill reports:

Fred Pearce is on the receiving end of the full fury of the warmosphere for his article about the Lisbon conference in New Scientist. Pearce, discussing who had agreed to turn up, said this:

But the leaders of mainstream climate science turned down the gig, including NASA’s Gavin Schmidt, who said the science was settled so there was nothing to discuss.

Read the rest here.

Comments

  1. The Loaded Dog's avatar The Loaded Dog says:

    Gavinology. How good is that?

    This paragraph is telling from Pearce’s piece:-

    Third, most agreed that there was no scientific basis for the world adopting a target to prevent global warming going above 2 °C. It was “arbitrary”, they said, and cooked up by climate scientists with a political agenda

    Shouldn’t something like this be reported by say, oh I dunno, the ABC?

    Or have they made an “arbitrary” decision on our behalf?

  2. clutching at straws?

  3. rukidding's avatar rukidding says:

    Yes it never ceases to amaze me how the science is settled brigade take every opportunity to crush those pesky skeptics.
    The only thing in the universe that moves faster than light is a global warming alarmist leaving a debate.:-)

  4. rukidding's avatar rukidding says:

    Of course Gavin still can’t work out why he can’t launch his boat from his office on the fourth floor