Carbon tax goes up in smoke

Julia's carbon tax?

That’s according to Dennis Shanahan in The Australian this morning:

LET’S hope for Labor’s sake Julia Gillard has a plan B for handling the introduction of a fixed carbon price because plan A has gone to hell in a hand basket.

Labor’s plans to introduce a carbon price from next July are in free fall, and the government is losing the political debate dreadfully. Its messages are confused, the tone is totally negative and the only certainty for business is an early start date it doesn’t want.

Apart from the date there’s no other detail. The Greens continue to appear to control the agenda; Labor is losing support to both the Coalition and the Greens and most importantly six years of public goodwill over fighting global warming has been lost.

Publicly Labor is clinging to delusional claims of success and hoping a relentless campaign against Tony Abbott for being a negative wrecker will turn the politics back to the government.

There are real misgivings about the timing and presentation of the carbon tax, and fears that when Kristina Keneally, who has embraced it in the NSW election, is thumped at the polls she can claim it was made worse by Gillard’s tax.

A disastrous Newspoll this week, showing Labor’s primary vote at a record low of 30 per cent and a reversal since December of popular support to 53 per cent against and 42 per cent for a carbon price to combat global warming by pushing up energy prices, is making Labor MPs even more nervous.

Labor’s defence that it’s damned if it does and damned if it doesn’t present detail on a new tax because of the damaging experience of the failed resources super profits tax is a spurious argument. It ignores that there is a perfect template for introducing a new tax: the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax of the Hawke era.

Analogies with John Howard’s strategy on the introduction of the GST are equally spurious and are about ministers reassuring backbenchers that a government can recover from a record low primary vote and win the next election. (source)

In other carbon tax news, grocery association chief states the obvious – prices at the supermarket will go up if electricity prices go up. Colour me amazed:

INDEPENDENT grocers are warning that prices in their stores will have to rise if Julia Gillard’s carbon pricing plan pushes up the cost of electricity.

John Cummings, chairman of the National Association of Retail Grocers of Australia, said based on a $26-a-tonne carbon price, independent supermarket operators could face extra electricity charges of between $500 and $1000 a week.

Mr Cummings said the extra charges would be passed on to consumers through higher prices because the industry operated on low margins and had no capacity to absorb the higher costs. (source)

And former NSW Labor premier Nathan Rees has joined the party dissing the tax:

FORMER NSW premier Nathan Rees has exposed a rift between Julia Gillard and the NSW Right over a carbon price, saying the proposed tax was crippling Labor in the lead-up to this month’s state election.

In an exclusive interview with The Australian, Mr Rees, who is in danger of losing his seat of Toongabbie in the traditional Labor heartland of Sydney’s western suburbs, said there was “no question at all” the Prime Minister’s proposed carbon tax was hurting NSW Labor in the polls.

“I’ve never seen an issue sink in so quickly,” Mr Rees told The Australian.

“Julia announced it on the Thursday and by the time I was door-knocking on the Saturday every second person was talking about it.” (source)

All the while, the Fairfax press and the ABC have their fingers in their ears shouting “la, la, la” and are pumping Garnaut’s latest nonsense for all its worth.

Comments

  1. former NSW Labor premier Nathan Rees has joined the party dissing the tax

    Whatever the reasons, they won’t be the right ones. This is the guy who left no doubt that he identifies with the lowest forms of alarmists. In 2008 he

    compared climate change sceptics to Nazi appeasers….it was important not to ignore the messages scientists were giving about the environment.

    ”The threat of climate change is catastrophic. In fact, the current wave of climate change scepticism smacks of 1930s-style appeasement: ‘Hide under the blankets and it will go away’. But it won’t go away.’As Nicholas Stern reported three years ago, that approach only invites catastrophe.”

    Here’s hoping the Liberal candidate for Toongabbie, Kirsty Lloyd, does him like a dinner in the election.

  2. The Loaded Dog's avatar The Loaded Dog says:

    Its messages are confused, the tone is totally negative

    says Shanahan.

    This is funny actually, the whole scam has been the same from the start, “confused messages” about CO2 and a “totally negative tone” in relation to it’s effects.

    (ie we’re all going to die, it’s a planetary emergency, the biggest moral challenge of our times, the ice caps are melting, 20 metre sea level rises………..human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria, the end of the world as we know it)

    Yes indeed, and as Jyouliar and her cronies try to justify taking more of our money we are simply witnessing an extension of the confused messages and negative tones of the warmist theology.

    We simply must pay, the alternative is just unthinkable.

    Typical antics of a CON artist.

  3. The Loaded Dog's avatar The Loaded Dog says:

    All the while, the Fairfax press and the ABC have their fingers in their ears shouting “la, la, la” and are pumping Garnaut’s latest nonsense for all its worth.

    Isn’t this amazing?

    TOTALLY delusional.

    They are actually trying to tell us what we’re thinking…or what to think.

    These media outlets have COMPLETELY abandoned their profession.

  4. rukidding's avatar rukidding says:

    “Julia announced it on the Thursday and by the time I was door-knocking on the Saturday every second person was talking about it.”

    And the Hippies think the Australian public does not understand.

    THE HELL THEY DON’T