Challenge to UK's Royal Society

Sold out?

The Royal Society is (was?) one of the most respected scientific institutions. However, in recent years, and like many other similar organisations around the world, it has sold out to climate alarmism and has abandoned its guiding principles of championing impartial scientific enquiry. Even its motto, Nullius in verba, meaning “take no one’s word for it”, looks forlorn and lost surrounded as it is by a fog of political posturing and environmental advocacy.

Andrew Montford, the author behind the Bishop Hill blog and The Hockey Stick Illusion has prepared a report for the Global Warming Policy Foundation:

The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) is calling on the Royal Society to restore a culture of open-mindedness and balanced assessment of climate science and climate policy.

In a new GWPF report, written by science author Andrew Montford, the Royal Society is urged to ensure that genuine controversies are reflected in its public debates and reports and that the full range of reputable scientific views are being considered.

“As the Society’s independence has disappeared, so has its former adherence to hard-nosed empirical science and a sober detachment from the political process. Gone are the doubts and uncertainties that afflict any real scientist, to be replaced with the dull certainties of the politician and the public relations man,” said Andrew Montford, author of the new report.

In his report, Andrew Montford describes the development of the Royal Society’s role in the climate debates since the 1980s. He shows the Society’s gradual closing of critical scrutiny and scientific impartiality and the emergence of an almost dogmatic confidence that climate science is all but settled.

In recent years, the Society has issued a series of highly political statements demanding drastic action on energy and climate policies from policy makers and governments. On the issue of climate change, it has adopted an increasingly political rather than scientific tone. Instead of being an open forum for informed scientific debate, the Society is at risk of turning into a quasi-political campaign group.

The GWPF report criticises the Society for being too narrow minded in its assessment of climate change and for failing to take into account views of eminent scientists and policy experts that do not accord with its own position.

In his foreword to the report, Professor Richard Lindzen (MIT), one of the world’s most eminent atmospheric scientists, warns that “the legitimate role of science as a powerful mode of inquiry has been replaced by the pretence of science to a position of political authority.”

The report can be downloaded here (PDF).


  1. Send a copy of this to them – the climate fraud house of cards is starting to crumble.

  2. One only needs to look at the Royal Societies Board Chairman to understand why they are so supportive of Climate Change:

    -Sir Peter Williams CBE FREng FRS (Chairman) is Honorary Treasurer and Vice President of the Royal Society. He is also a member of the InterAcademy Council chosen by UN (Mr. Ban Ki-Moon) and IPCC (R.Pachauri) to investigate the IPCC following Climategate and Glaciergate, which as we all know cleared everybody of everything:

    The report released Monday by the panel from the InterAcademy Council, which links scientific institutions around the world, did not try to reassess the science of the climate assessment itself. It said the way the United Nations panel goes about its work has “been successful overall.”

  3. Lew Skannen says:

    As Delingpole put it – 350 years of top notch reputation pi**ed up against the wall in the space of a decade.
    Now THAT is something that has happened faster than scientists expected and is definitely worse that we thought.

  4. Sir Francis Bacon, eldest son of Queen Elizabeth I, will be turning in his grave.

    He used many psuedonyms to hide his real identity, including ShakeSpeare which he made up from the goddess Spear Shaker, Athena. He was not just a playwright but an absolute genius. His Four Idols show that he was a great Philosopher and he was the first man to experiment to test science theories. Placing his hand in ice cold water may have caused his death in 1626.

    His ideas in ‘New Atlantis’ became the new science which led to his followers setting up the Royal Society some two decades later.

%d bloggers like this: